Skip to main contentSkip to navigationSkip to navigation
Book saying 'english' and magnifying glass on a wooden desk
Learn English concept. The bill has proven controversial, with the opposition vowing to repeal it if elected next year. Photograph: aleksandr Lychagin/Alamy
Learn English concept. The bill has proven controversial, with the opposition vowing to repeal it if elected next year. Photograph: aleksandr Lychagin/Alamy

New Zealand passes plain language bill to jettison jargon

This article is more than 1 year old

Officials will need to communicate clearly with the public as part of a bid to improve accessibility for all parts of society

New Zealand has bid its farewell to grandiloquent memos and sesquipedalian documents, passing a new law to banish jargon and complex language from its bureaucracy.

The Plain Language Act, which requires officials to use plain, easily understood language when communicating with the public, passed its third reading on Wednesday night. The government says it will make for a more inclusive democracy, particularly for people who speak English as a second language, people with disabilities, and those with lower levels of education.

MP Rachel Boyack, who presented the bill, said: “People living in New Zealand have a right to understand what the government is asking them to do, and what their rights are, what they’re entitled to from government.”

The bill has proven controversial, with the opposition vowing to repeal it if elected next year. National MP Simeon Brown said on Wednesday that it was “a solution looking for a problem” and would create new layers of bureaucracy in the form of plain language officers.

“Plain language police! That’s what they’ll become. The plain language police, who will be having their clipboards and their little white coats, running around, looking over the shoulders of all the public servants, checking … Are they writing with words of less than one syllable?” he said.

Plain language advocates have said the bill will save money and government time – and that clear communications are key to a functioning democracy. Other submitters argued the bill would improve accessibility for people with disabilities, elderly people, and those who needed documents translated.

In a colourful, at times heated debate, MPs drew on Shakespeare, Chaucer and Wordsworth, to defend – and excoriate – the bill.

“Be not afraid of plain language,” said MP Glen Bennett, “all of you beautifully educated people, with eloquent spoons in your mouths … You can still speak your big, wonderful, wonderful, huge words that I don’t have, and I’m OK with that, because this is around accessibility. This is around having language that everyone and anyone can understand.”

Greens MP Teanau Tuiono: “To be or not to be, that is the big question, but on the ‘be’ side they have got 65 votes, and so that’s probably going to happen.”

The bill ultimately passed with support from the Labour, Green and Māori parties.

Explore more on these topics

Most viewed

Most viewed