From: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: "William A . Kennington III" <wak@google.com>,
Lei YU <mine260309@gmail.com>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] jffs2: Hook up splice_write callback
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 00:15:37 +1030 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210330134537.423447-1-joel@jms.id.au> (raw)
overlayfs using jffs2 as the upper filesystem would fail in some cases
since moving to v5.10. The test case used was to run 'touch' on a file
that exists in the lower fs, causing the modification time to be
updated. It returns EINVAL when the bug is triggered.
A bisection showed this was introduced in v5.9-rc1, with commit
36e2c7421f02 ("fs: don't allow splice read/write without explicit ops").
Reverting that commit restores the expected behaviour.
Some digging showed that this was due to jffs2 lacking an implementation
of splice_write. (For unknown reasons the warn_unsupported that should
trigger was not displaying any output).
Adding this patch resolved the issue and the test now passes.
Fixes: 36e2c7421f02 ("fs: don't allow splice read/write without explicit ops")
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
---
fs/jffs2/file.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/fs/jffs2/file.c b/fs/jffs2/file.c
index f8fb89b10227..4fc8cd698d1a 100644
--- a/fs/jffs2/file.c
+++ b/fs/jffs2/file.c
@@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ const struct file_operations jffs2_file_operations =
.mmap = generic_file_readonly_mmap,
.fsync = jffs2_fsync,
.splice_read = generic_file_splice_read,
+ .splice_write = iter_file_splice_write,
};
/* jffs2_file_inode_operations */
--
2.30.2
next reply other threads:[~2021-03-30 13:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-30 13:45 Joel Stanley [this message]
2021-03-30 16:17 ` [PATCH] jffs2: Hook up splice_write callback Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-30 18:31 ` Al Viro
2021-03-30 18:38 ` Al Viro
2021-03-31 14:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-31 4:55 ` Lei YU
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210330134537.423447-1-joel@jms.id.au \
--to=joel@jms.id.au \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mine260309@gmail.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=wak@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).